194k views
4 votes
there a smallest real number a for which x26x is big-o of ax? explain your answer. (b) (2 points) is there a smallest integer number a for which x26x is big-o of ax? explain your answer.

User Caopeng
by
7.3k points

2 Answers

3 votes

Final answer:

No smallest real number exists for which x^2+6x is Big O of ax; a real number slightly larger than 1 would suffice. However, for integer values, the smallest integer a for which x^2+6x is Big O of ax is 2, because x^2 grows faster than ax whenever a<2.

Step-by-step explanation:

Big O Notation and Real Numbers

When considering whether x2+6x is Big O of ax, a clear definition of Big O notation is required. Big O notation is a way to describe the upper bound of a function in terms of another, often simpler, function. Specifically, f(x) is O(g(x)) if there exist positive constants C and k such that |f(x)| ≤ C|g(x)| for all x ≥ k. In this case, we need to find a real number a so that x2+6x ≤ C * ax for x sufficiently large. Conceptually, as x grows, x2 will eventually dominate 6x, meaning a has to be at least as big as 1 to account for the term x2. No smallest real number a exists because you can always choose another smaller number that would also work for a sufficiently large C.

Big O Notation and Integer Numbers

If we specifically look for the smallest integer number a for which x2+6x is Big O of ax, then the rules change slightly, since integers are not as flexible as real numbers. The smallest integer value of a that makes x2+6x ≤ C * ax for all sufficiently large x will be 2. This is because, simply put, the term x2 cannot be bounded by ax with a<1 since x2 grows faster than ax in that scenario. However, with a ≥ 2, it becomes possible to find a constant C that works.

User Adrian Hall
by
8.6k points
3 votes

Final answer:

No smallest real number a can make f(x) = x + 6x Big-O of g(x) = ax because Big-O defines an upper bound and any a > 7 would suffice, which means there is no single smallest value for a.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question asks whether there exists a smallest real number a for which the function f(x) = x + 6x is Big-O of g(x) = ax. For part (a), we can say that such a smallest real number does not exist because in Big-O notation, we are concerned with the upper bound of the growth rate of the function as x approaches infinity. As both terms in f(x) are linear, any a larger than 7 would suffice, making f(x) Big-O of g(x), and there is no single smallest value since we can always find a slightly smaller a that still satisfies the Big-O condition but is not the absolute smallest.

User Tuyen
by
8.6k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories