If an author borrows authority to help substantiate their arguments, you should always use the CRAAP analysis to verify their research. True or False?
False.
While the CRAAP analysis is a useful tool for evaluating the credibility and reliability of sources, it is not always necessary to use it when an author borrows authority to help substantiate their arguments. Borrowing authority simply means that the author is using the expertise or credibility of another person or organization to support their own argument. In such cases, it may be more appropriate to evaluate the credibility of the borrowed authority rather than the author's research itself.
For example, if an author cites a reputable academic journal or a well-respected expert in a particular field, it may be reasonable to assume that the borrowed authority is credible without necessarily conducting a CRAAP analysis on the author's research. However, it is always important to critically evaluate sources and arguments, regardless of the method used to support them
~ Zeph