47.8k views
2 votes
Compare and contrast the views expressed by Senators Harding and Cox regarding the role that the USA should play in helping to maintain future world peace.

1 Answer

1 vote

Answer: Senator Warren G. Harding and Senator James M. Cox were the two main presidential candidates in the 1920 United States presidential election. They both had different views on the role of the United States in maintaining world peace after World War I.

Senator Harding believed in the United States staying out of international affairs and avoiding foreign entanglements. He believed that the United States should focus on its own internal affairs and leave the rest of the world to its own devices. He stated, "America's present need is not heroics but healing; not nostrums but normalcy; not revolution but restoration."

On the other hand, Senator Cox believed that the United States had a responsibility to play an active role in maintaining world peace. He believed that the United States should support the League of Nations and work with other countries to prevent future wars. He stated, "We must have a foreign policy that is based on the principles of fair play, justice, and the maintenance of world peace."

In summary, Senator Harding believed in isolationism and a focus on domestic affairs, while Senator Cox believed in internationalism and the United States playing an active role in maintaining world peace.

Step-by-step explanation:

User EpsilonAlpha
by
8.2k points