Question

Margot, a poetry teacher, hopes to shape her students' poetry skills so that they become progressively better over the course of writing three poems. On the first poem, she provides each student with extensive positive and negative feedback. On the second poem, she has less time for grading and only gives students a letter grade and a few positive notes. Given this feedback, how are students likely to perform on the next and final poem?

a. The poems will be of worse quality than the first two submissions.
b. Many students will not submit a third and final poem.
c. The poems will be of better quality than the first two submissions.
d. The poems will be of similar quality to the first two submissions.

Answer 1

Step-by-step explanation:

Based on research on feedback and motivation, the answer is likely (c) the poems will be of better quality than the first two submissions.

Studies have shown that feedback can be most effective when it is specific, timely, and focused on the task rather than the person. Margot's extensive positive and negative feedback on the first poem likely provided students with specific and useful information to improve their poetry skills. This feedback, combined with the motivation to improve, is likely to lead to better quality poems on the second submission.

Furthermore, providing a letter grade and a few positive notes on the second poem can still provide some motivation and direction for students to improve their poetry skills further. As long as the feedback is constructive and focused on the task rather than the person, it is likely to lead to continued improvement in the final poem.

Overall, the feedback that Margot provides to her students, along with their motivation to improve, is likely to lead to better quality poems over time.