Question

Make it sound like it came from a 6th grader or lower lease make it around easy to read

You have learned about absolute and constitutional monarchies and their effects on the nations that they served. An absolute monarchy worked for Russia until the early 18th century. However, England transitioned to a constitutional monarchy. Which do you think was a better form of government for Europeans at that time?

Steps:
Select the monarchy you think was a better form of government for Europeans from the 1500s to 1700s: absolute or constitutional.
Write an argument for why you think your selected form was better for Europeans at this time.
Be sure to include at least two reasons why your selected form was better and at least one comparison to the form you did not select.
Your argument must contain at least 4–5 sentences.

Answer 1

I think a Constitutional Monarchy is the better form of government because they have rules where that are kept within its limits and are elected by its citizens. On the other hand, Absolute Monarchy gives the leader complete 100% power and has no limits. This basically means a leader you don't even know could just grab you middle of the streets and throw you in jail with the reason of "I just feel like it" which is Absolute Monarchy. There is no need for such power there is a reason why the American government is split between multiple parts to avoid absolutism

Sorry if the answer is too extreme heh