Answer:
Strike a balance between the powers of the federal government and the states.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Founders of the United States allowed for both state-based and congressional-based methods of proposing and ratifying constitutional amendments in order to strike a balance between the powers of the federal government and the states.
At the time of the Constitutional Convention, there were concerns that the new federal government would be too powerful and could infringe on the rights of the states and their citizens. To address these concerns, the Founders designed a system of federalism in which power is shared between the federal government and the states. The ability to propose and ratify amendments to the Constitution through both state-based and congressional-based methods reflects this balance of power.
The state-based method of proposing amendments, in which two-thirds of the states must call for a convention, gives the states a direct role in the amendment process and allows them to bypass Congress if they feel that Congress is not adequately representing their interests. This method gives the states a significant amount of power in the amendment process and allows them to push for changes to the Constitution that they feel are necessary.
The congressional-based method of proposing amendments, on the other hand, requires two-thirds of both houses of Congress to vote in favor of the amendment. This method gives Congress the power to propose amendments and ensures that the federal government has a role in the amendment process.
Similarly, the Founders allowed for both state-based and congressional-based methods of ratifying amendments in order to balance the powers of the federal government and the states. The state-based method of ratification requires approval from three-fourths of the states, while the congressional-based method requires approval from three-fourths of state legislatures. By giving both the states and Congress a role in the amendment process, the Founders ensured that power would be distributed in a way that balanced the interests of the federal government and the states.