173k views
4 votes
Rodrigo's three-year-old sister says the phrase "We goed to the store" instead of "We went to the store. According to Noam Chomsky, what is the best explanation for her behavior?

Her parents have not presented her with the appropriate corrective feedback to teach her not to use the incorrect form.
D
She is overregularizing her use of the past tense.
She has heard other children using the incorrect form and has learned that it is correct
She has not yet entered the concrete operational stage of cognition, in which she will be able to learn the correct form of the word.
She has a specific language impairment, which has prevented her from acquiring the correct form.

User Albruno
by
6.7k points

2 Answers

6 votes

Answer:

She has not yet entered the concrete operational stage of cognition, in which she will be able to learn the correct form of the word.

User Somputer
by
7.5k points
2 votes

Answer:

She is overregularizing her use of the past tense.

Step-by-step explanation:

According to Noam Chomsky, the best explanation for Rodrigo's three-year-old sister's behavior is that she is overregularizing her use of the past tense. This means that she is applying a grammatical rule too widely and using the same rule for irregular verbs, which do not follow the regular past tense rule. For example, she is using "goed" instead of "went". Chomsky believed that children have an innate ability to acquire language and that they create rules for grammar themselves based on the language they hear around them. This process is known as universal grammar. Overregularization is a common part of the process of language acquisition and occurs when children apply a rule too widely. It is a sign of the child's attempt to create and apply grammar rules, rather than simply memorizing specific phrases.

User Gil Grencho
by
7.8k points