Answer:
An example of a legal action by a business organization that strikes me as wrong is when a corporation uses aggressive tax avoidance strategies to minimize their tax liability, even if it means not paying their fair share of taxes. While tax avoidance may not necessarily be illegal, it can be seen as ethically dubious because it places an unfair burden on other taxpayers and governments.
One reason why I think this is wrong is that businesses have a responsibility to contribute to the communities in which they operate. By avoiding taxes, corporations are not fulfilling this responsibility, and they may be shifting the burden of supporting public services and infrastructure onto individual taxpayers who may be less able to afford it.
Another reason why I think this is wrong is that tax avoidance can create a negative public image for the corporation. In many cases, companies that engage in aggressive tax avoidance may be seen as prioritizing their own profits over the well-being of the community and society. This can lead to a loss of trust among customers, shareholders, and the general public, which can have long-term consequences for the company's reputation and success.
In summary, while aggressive tax avoidance may be legal, it strikes me as wrong because it can place an unfair burden on other taxpayers and governments, and it can also create a negative public image for the corporation. Companies have a responsibility to contribute to the communities in which they operate and to prioritize the well-being of society over their own profits.