Question

The writers wrote sentence 9 (reproduced below) to convince the reader that it is feasible for the industry to pay for the clinical trials on E-Cig safety, and they want to ensure they have achieved this goal.

Although this would be an undeniably expensive undertaking, the estimated value of the E-Cig market is in the billion-dollar range, indicating that tobacco and E-Cig companies could likely foot this bill.

Which version of the sentence best accomplishes this goal?

Answer 1

To convince readers of the industry's ability to fund E-Cig safety trials, the sentence should highlight the E-Cig market's value and tobacco companies' historical financial capabilities and interests in maintaining market stability.

Step-by-step explanation:

The sentence in question aims to convince the reader that funding clinical trials on E-Cig safety by the industry is feasible. A more effective version of the sentence would emphasize not just the high value of the E-Cig market, but also the profitability and financial capability of tobacco companies who have historically funded similar endeavors and have a vested interest in maintaining market stability. The sentence could highlight precedent cases where the industry has supported financial burdens to protect its interests or align with regulatory requirements. This would reinforce the argument that the industry, with its billion-dollar worth, has the means and possibly the motivation to fund such trials when considering the long-term benefits and the necessity of complying with likely future regulations.