Question

"It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases, must of necessity expound and interpret that rule. If two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each."

—Chief Justice John Marshall, 1803

Which conclusion can be drawn from this excerpt of the Supreme Court's decision in Marbury v. Madison?
Responses

A The jurisdiction granted to the judicial branch is limited to federal and constitutional laws.The jurisdiction granted to the judicial branch is limited to federal and constitutional laws.

B This decision gave Congress the authority to charter the National Bank, which angered the Anti-Federalists.This decision gave Congress the authority to charter the National Bank, which angered the Anti-Federalists.

C This decision strengthened the "Elastic Clause" of the U.S. Constitution and expanded the powers of Congress.This decision strengthened the "Elastic Clause" of the U.S. Constitution and expanded the powers of Congress.

D This decision established the concept of judicial review and strengthened the role of the Judicial branch.This decision established the concept of judicial review and strengthened the role of the Judicial branch.

Answer 1

D. This decision established the concept of judicial review and strengthened the role of the Judicial branch.This decision established the concept of judicial review and strengthened the role of the Judicial branch.

Step-by-step explanation:

The conclusion that can be drawn from this excerpt of the Supreme Court's decision in Marbury v. Madison is that the decision established the concept of judicial review and strengthened the role of the Judicial branch, as it emphasizes the judicial branch's duty to interpret the law and decide on the operation of conflicting laws. Therefore, the correct answer is D.