Final answer:
Match each advantage or disadvantage with the appropriate description: Arbitration is more efficient than trial, mediation may result in less favorable agreements, online case submission may not be as thorough, and mediation supports the maintenance of relationships.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question asks for the matching of advantages and disadvantages of various forms of dispute resolution with their appropriate description. Here's how they match:
- Advantage of Arbitration: More efficient than trial - Arbitration typically resolves disputes faster than going to court due to its less formal procedures and the ability to schedule hearings more quickly.
- Disadvantage of Mediation: Agreement may be less favorable than trial outcome - Mediation requires compromise, which sometimes could result in an agreement that's not as favorable as what a party might have obtained in a trial.
- Disadvantage of OCS (Online Case Submission): Not designed for fairness or uncovering all facts - OCS, while speedy, may not delve deeply into the case, potentially missing out on fair examination of all relevant information.
- Advantage of Mediation: Can work well if parties want to maintain a relationship - Mediation is less adversarial and can be a better choice when parties have an ongoing relationship that they wish to preserve post-dispute.
Each method of dispute resolution offers different benefits and has different drawbacks, and the most appropriate one often depends on the specific circumstances of the case at hand.