219k views
3 votes
What else is needed to prove these triangles congruent using the ASA postulate?

A. Nothing else is needed to use the ASA postulate.

B. Both
C. BC ≅ DC, and

What else is needed to prove these triangles congruent using the ASA postulate? A-example-1

1 Answer

2 votes

To find:-

  • What else is needed to prove the given triangles congruent by ASA postulate .

Answer:-

We are here given two triangles ∆ACB and ∆ECD , and we need to prove them congruent by ASA postulate.

For traingles to be congruent by ASA , two sides of the triangle and the angle between the two sides of the two triangles should be equal.

So , in ∆ACB and ∆ECD , we have;

  • AC = CD [ given ]

Also , here

  • ∠ACB = ∠ECD ( vertically opposite angles)

and angle C is between sides AC and BC in ∆ACB and it is between EC and DC in ∆ECD , so BC and DC should be also equal.

Therefore,

BC = DC and C for both traingles needs to be congruent .

Hence option C is correct.

and we are done!

User Lamarant
by
7.9k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories