Answer:
The election reform of the early 1900s that gave the people more say in who would run for public office in Texas was the adoption of the "direct primary" system. Prior to the direct primary, candidates for public office in Texas were nominated by party leaders in closed-door conventions, often resulting in a system of "King Caucus" in which party bosses and political machines controlled the nomination process. The direct primary allowed voters to directly choose their party's nominees for the general election, thereby increasing the power of individual voters and reducing the influence of party leaders and political machines.
The adoption of the direct primary was part of a broader Progressive-era movement that aimed to increase government transparency and accountability and reduce the power of political machines and corruption. The direct primary was seen as a way to increase voter participation and give voters more control over the nomination process, which in turn would lead to more responsive and accountable government.
The direct primary system was first implemented in Texas in 1905 for statewide elections and was gradually adopted by other states in the following decades. Today, the direct primary is the most common method of candidate selection in the United States, and is seen as an important tool for promoting democratic accountability and citizen participation in the political process.
Step-by-step explanation: