The statement "Peace is accomplished in a boardroom, not on the battle field" implies that peace is best achieved through negotiation and diplomacy, rather than through violence and conflict. This idea is grounded in the belief that peaceful resolution of conflicts is more beneficial and sustainable in the long term than relying on military force.
The use of force and violence in resolving conflicts has been a persistent problem throughout history. Wars have caused massive destruction, loss of life, and disruption to economies and societies. Furthermore, military solutions to conflicts often result in only temporary peace, with new conflicts emerging soon after. On the other hand, peaceful resolutions to conflicts through negotiation and diplomacy can provide a more lasting solution, by addressing the underlying issues that led to the conflict in the first place.
Diplomacy and negotiation also offer a more cost-effective solution to resolving conflicts. Wars are extremely expensive, with the cost of military operations, weapons, and post-conflict reconstruction adding up to massive sums of money. By contrast, peace negotiations can be conducted with a much lower budget, and can avoid the long-term costs of rebuilding after a war.
In conclusion, the idea that peace is best achieved through negotiation and diplomacy, rather than through violence and conflict, is a valid one. By resolving conflicts peacefully, societies can avoid the devastating effects of war, and achieve lasting and sustainable peace. Whether in a boardroom or elsewhere, peace must be actively pursued through diplomacy, negotiation, and compromise in order to create a safer and more harmonious world for future generations.