Final answer:
Tech-induced anxieties are complex as they relate to both the positive potential and negative consequences of technology use. While technology provides opportunities, it also brings concerns about cybercrime, privacy infringement, and the replacement of human skills and jobs. An educational leader should critically evaluate mixed research outcomes to guide nuanced technology integration.
Step-by-step explanation:
Identifying the true and false statements about tech-induced anxieties involves understanding the complexities of technology integration in society. To say that all strong emotions tied to technology should be managed by metacognition overlooks the nuances of each individual's interaction with tech and thus can be considered a false statement. Access to technology can lead to greater opportunities, but there are also legitimate concerns such as cybercrime, privacy infringement, and potentially negative impacts on cognitive and social skills.
Considering the differing research findings on technology's effects on students, an educational leader should approach these discrepancies by critically evaluating the methodologies of the studies, the contexts in which the technologies were used, and balance these findings to provide nuanced guidance that might work best for their specific educational context.
When discussing the threat of AI, it is true that industry leaders have expressed concerns over a variety of potential dangers, including cybercrime, privacy infringement, data misuse, diminishing human skills, and job loss. The Swedish philosopher Nick Bostrom's concerns add to this by highlighting a fundamental mismatch that could lead to the development of superintelligent machines that do not prioritize human values and safety.