Question

In McCulloch v. Maryland (1819), the Supreme Court ruled that the state of Maryland had no right to tax the Second Bank of the United States because the federal government had established the bank. In a short essay, answer these questions:

How do you think a Federalist would have responded to this ruling? How would this person have justified his or her position?
How do you think an Anti-Federalist would have responded to this ruling? How would this person have justified his or her position?
How has the debate regarding state and federal power continued to affect U.S. politics since this ruling?

Answer 1

Out of all possible outcomes, it would most likely answer "c" as other options do not seem to match as well as answer c.

Step-by-step explanation: