222k views
14 votes
Juli says she can use the patterns of equivalent ratios in the multiplication table below to write an infinite number of ratios that are equivalent to 6:10.

Which statement explains whether Juli is correct?
a. She is correct because she can multiply 6 and 10 by any number to form an equivalent ratio.
b. She is correct because 6:10 can be written as 1:2 and there are an infinite number of ratios for 1:2.
c. She is not correct because the multiplication table does not include multiples of 10.
d. She is not correct because 6:10 is equivalent to 3:5 and there are only 9 ratios in the multiplication table that are equivalent to 3:5.

2 Answers

11 votes
Sure but I think it’s C
User Cleo
by
7.8k points
6 votes
When is it due do u need it rn
User Zac Wrangler
by
7.8k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories