Question

Why was Roosevelt worried about the future of the US government? Was the New Deal a limited revolution? Why or why not?

Why was the possibility of John Nance Garner becoming president so dangerous according to the author?

Is the author correct that the 1932 election was the greatest threat to the American experiment since 1860 and the Civil War? Explain.

How does the debate between FDR and Hoover impact politics today?

Answer 1

As the question contains several parts to it, So I will be answering them one by one:

1. Due to the terrible economic crisis of the Great Depression and its effects on the American people, which threatened both the stability of the nation and the capacity of the government to meet the demands of the populace, Franklin D. Roosevelt was concerned about the future of the US government.

• The New Deal can be viewed as a limited revolution because, despite making important changes to the US economy and government policies, it did not fundamentally alter the makeup of American society or the system of government or lead to a whole revision of the current one.

2. Some people viewed John Nance Garner as a risky candidate for

the presidency due to his conservatism and opposition to FDR's

New Deal initiatives.

3. It depends on how you look at it whether the 1932 election posed

the worst threat to the American experiment since the Civil War,

according to the author. Others may contend that there were other

periods in American history that constituted a larger threat to the

country, even if the election and its aftermath resulted in enormous

changes to the nation and its administration.

4. As a part of a larger philosophical discussion regarding the

function of government in addressing economic and social crises,

the debate between FDR and Hoover has continued to have an

impact on politics to this day. Political discourse and policy choices

are still influenced by this argument, especially during economic

downturns.

Hope it helps! :)