Well these two civilizations have some strong similarities in many aspects, yet also having a lot of contrasts. Both prehistoric civilizations possessed a strong sense of identity and culture. While some paid cash, others borrowed. There was a strong feeling of identity and culture in both primordial civilizations. Some people paid with cash, while others borrowed. A nearby river would be developed and integrated into China and India's daily lives and agriculture, just like other civilizations have done. However, there were certain distinctions between them, like the social structure's hierarchy, religious influences, cultural norms, and the significance of trade to the economy. Different political systems and methods of populist administration were adopted by the Chinese and Indian civilizations, one of which was more effective and stable than the other. China had a very large population, therefore they obviously required food and resources to maintain their growth. Regardless of how you look at it, both Chinese and Indian civilizations had significant and powerful ways of evolving over time. Due to the globalization of certain ideas, like religion, their dynamics were different while also sharing some common traits. China surpassed India because its economy was privatized and prices were released more quickly, among other factors. Indian culture used religion and social strata or structures as a means of population control. India’s weak political traditions are a result of the caste system and decentralized government that was used. Therefore, despite their shared similarities, in my perspective they’re more different than similar to each other.