Question

In New York Times v. Sullivan, the Supreme Court ruled that statements about public figures are examples of libel only when they are made with malice and and reckless disregard for the truth. How does this ruling support a healthy democracy?

Answer 1

Answer: 1. it allows people the freedom to criticize public officials, 2. schools, prisons, military bases, 3. journalists are entitled to cover trials, it is difficult for public officials to win libel cases

Step-by-step explanation:

test lol

Answer 2

The ruling in New York Times v. Sullivan supports a healthy democracy by allowing for the free exchange of ideas and information.

This ruling means that people are free to speak openly about public figures—even if their statements are controversial or unpopular.

This freedom of speech and expression helps to keep our democracy healthy by ensuring that people are able to openly criticize and debate topics without fear of retaliation.