Answer:
Aristotle's way of classifying organisms was a major problem because it was based on observable characteristics and morphological similarities, rather than on evolutionary relationships. He divided all living things into two main categories: plants and animals, and then further divided each of these categories into subcategories based on specific characteristics such as size, shape, habitat, and behavior.
However, this classification method did not consider the evolutionary relationships between species, which meant that organisms that were more closely related to each other could be classified into different categories based on superficial differences. This made it difficult to accurately understand the relationships between different species and trace their evolutionary history.
In addition, Aristotle's classification method was limited by his own biases and lack of knowledge about the natural world. He believed that certain species were inherently superior to others and that humans were the most superior species. This led to a hierarchical classification system that was not based on scientific evidence and reflected cultural and ideological biases rather than biological reality.
Overall, Aristotle's way of classifying organisms was problematic and was eventually replaced by the modern classification system, which is based on evolutionary relationships and uses a branching tree diagram called a phylogenetic tree to depict the evolutionary relationships between species.