Answer:
b) Federal supremacy on immigration was affirmed.
Step-by-step explanation:
Arizona vs. the United States was a supreme court case in 2012 that ruled in favor of the United States.
Causes of the Case
The main issue of the case surrounded Arizona law SB 1070. This law intended to give local law enforcement the ability to enforce federal immigration law. This means that the law attempted to give non-federal officers the to investigate the immigration status of a person. Arizona lawmakers decided that illegal immigration had become too large of a problem, so they wanted more power to enforce immigration laws. Prior to this law, only federal officers had the ability to investigate immigration and deport people. Many thought that this law was unconstitutional and would undermine the authority of the federal government.
Effects of the Case
The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the United States. The ruling said that states did not have the power to enforce immigration laws without a federal organization. The main effect of the case is that it established the federal government's complete control over immigration law. This ruling would set the precedent that states could not interfere with the federal government's immigration process or investigations.