Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
I am not going to form opinions. Here are some arguments that could be made by Team 1 in support of the law requiring restaurant employees to know and employ the Heimlich maneuver:
- Quick response time: Restaurant employees are often the first individuals on the scene when someone starts choking. They are trained to respond to emergencies and the Heimlich maneuver is a simple and effective way to dislodge food that has become stuck in the windpipe.
- Life-saving technique: The Heimlich maneuver can be the difference between life and death in a choking emergency. It is a technique that anyone can learn, and it has been proven to be effective in many choking situations.
- Responsibility to protect: Restaurants have a responsibility to protect the health and safety of their customers. By requiring their employees to be trained in the Heimlich maneuver, they are taking a proactive step to ensure that their customers are protected in the event of a choking emergency.
- Legal liability: If a restaurant employee does not know the Heimlich maneuver and is unable to assist a choking customer, the restaurant could face legal liability for any harm that results. This could include damages for medical expenses, lost wages, and emotional distress.
In conclusion, there are strong arguments for the law requiring restaurant employees to know and employ the Heimlich maneuver. It is a simple, effective, and potentially life-saving technique that could make a significant difference in the outcome of a choking emergency.
_____________________________________________________
I hope this information is helpful. I mostly prefer MyAssignmentHelp.com for law assignments. Please let me know if you have any additional questions or refer to MyAssignmentHelp.com for further assistance.