Question

PLEASE HELP!!!! You can pick any poll just please help!

Write an essay in which you evaluate a poll of your choice from Pew Research Center. You can find the link on the assignment page. After you select a poll, make sure you examine the data tables and the questionnaire itself, not just the article. (Look for "report materials" on the article web page.) As you go over the information, ask:
How trustworthy are the data? How do you know if the data are trustworthy?
What, if anything, could the pollster have done differently when designing questions and sampling the Americans who took the poll?
What are the advantages and disadvantages of polling in general, and how does this poll in particular illustrate your point?
Support your argument by:
Identifying at least two results of the poll and discussing what factors you think explain these results (whether the pollster intended it or not)
Evaluating the wording of the survey questions, using at least one specific question as an example
Drawing on information from outside sources (such as those listed under "Related Sources" on the assignment page) about how polling works and how polls can produce credible or questionable results
Make sure you choose a poll that focuses on public opinion and a political issue, although most of the polls available from Pew Research Center fit that description. Also make sure that you examine an actual poll. (Pew Research Center has other types of articles as well.)

Answer 1

The poll I have chosen is "Americans, Politics and Science Issues" from Pew Research Center. This poll aimed to gauge the American public's views on a variety of science and technology related issues, including climate change, genetically modified foods, and vaccine mandates.

In terms of the trustworthiness of the data, Pew Research Center is widely recognized as a reputable and non-partisan organization that adheres to high standards in research methodology. In this particular poll, the data was collected through a nationally representative sample of 2,566 U.S. adults and was conducted in a way that minimizes the risk of bias and accurately represents the American public.

However, like all polls, this one also has limitations. One potential issue is the self-selection bias, as individuals who choose to participate in the poll may not be representative of the general population. Additionally, the way the questions are phrased and the order in which they are asked can also impact the results. For example, a question that frames an issue in a certain way may lead respondents to answer differently than if the same issue were framed differently.

One question that illustrates this point is Question 21, which asks, "Do you think that genetically modified foods are generally safe to eat, or not?" The phrasing of this question implies that the general consensus is that genetically modified foods are safe to eat, which may have influenced the respondents' answers. A more neutral phrasing, such as "What is your opinion on the safety of genetically modified foods?" may have produced different results.

In terms of the results of the poll, two findings worth mentioning are:

• Nearly half of Americans (48%) believe that climate change is mostly caused by human activity, while a similar share (43%) attribute it mostly to natural patterns.

• A large majority of Americans (81%) believe that vaccine mandates for children should be required.

These results highlight the divided views on climate change and the strong support for vaccine mandates in the United States. Factors that may contribute to these views include political affiliation, education level, and access to information.

In conclusion, while polling can provide valuable insights into public opinion, it is important to consider its limitations and limitations. The Pew Research Center's "Americans, Politics and Science Issues" poll is a well-designed and trustworthy survey that provides a snapshot of American views on science and technology related issues. However, the phrasing of questions and potential self-selection bias must be taken into consideration when evaluating the results.