Question

Part C -Use the table from Part B to respond to the prompt: Write an analysis discussing the sufficiency and relevancy of the evidence and the overall effectiveness of the argument presented in "How Are Youth Climate Activists Are Empowering Campaigners from Countries Suffering Most from Global Warming" by Abhishyant Kidangoor.

Answer 1

Abhishyant Kidangoor's article on the collaboration between youth climate activists and affected nations lacks persuasive impact due to inadequate evidence and a scattered argument.

How to explain

The piece leans heavily on anecdotal instances and personal insights, lacking robust data or statistics to substantiate claims. It struggles with coherence, veering between various facets of climate activism without establishing a cohesive line of reasoning.

To bolster its persuasiveness, the article needs quantitative evidence on funding and successful projects, detailed case studies of collaborations, and a more focused thematic approach. A clearer structure and deeper exploration of empowerment mechanisms would significantly enhance the article's effectiveness.

The Complete Question

Write an analysis discussing the sufficiency and relevancy of the evidence and the overall effectiveness of the argument presented in "How Are Youth Climate Activists Are Empowering Campaigners from Countries Suffering Most from Global Warming" by Abhishyant Kidangoor.

Answer 2

Answer:Summary:

What is the claim?

What are the main reasons or key ideas?

What does the author suggest or conclude?

The article's claim is that previously marginalized voices are starting to take the place they deserve in the climate change debate.

The author supports the claim with quotes, personal stories, and a report on a conference in which marginalized voices are amplified.

He concludes that progress has been made toward giving marginalized voices a meaningful platform.

Evaluation of Evidence:

Is the evidence relevant?

Is the evidence sufficient?

The author's evidence is both relevant and sufficient.

Commentary:

Is the reasoning valid?

Is the overall argument effective?

The author's reasoning is valid, and the overall argument is effective.

Explanation: Do not forget to use your own words