18.4k views
3 votes
PLEASE HELP!! I need argument points and sources!!

Write an essay in which you use evidence from the post-Trump political landscape to reevaluate Anis Shivani's predictions. How do party politics today prove or disprove Shivani's original arguments? Draw your own conclusions. As you conduct research, focus on at least some of the following topics from the 2003 article:
Divided government
Voter turnout
Candidate-centered elections
Party realignment
Changing trends in media
Polarization
The role of third parties
Start by examining the two articles about Donald Trump that are listed on the assignment page, but conduct additional research as needed.
After you have formulated your argument, anticipate readers who may disagree with your position by refuting at least one counterargument. You may devote an entire body paragraph to the counterargument. Alternatively, you may respond to a counterargument in the same paragraph in which you make a larger point.

User Le Hibou
by
8.5k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Answer:

Anis Shivani wrote "The End of Politics" in 2003, in which he predicted the decline of the two-party system and the rise of third parties in the American political landscape. In the post-Trump political landscape, we can see that some of Shivani's predictions have come true, while others have not.

Divided government: Shivani argued that divided government, where the presidency and Congress are controlled by different parties, would become the norm. This has indeed come to fruition, with the presidency being held by Democrats and Congress being controlled by Republicans for the majority of the Trump administration.

Voter turnout: Shivani also predicted that voter turnout would decline, as citizens would become disillusioned with the political process. While voter turnout has increased in some elections, it remains lower than in previous decades.

Candidate-centered elections: Shivani believed that elections would become more candidate-centered, as opposed to party-centered. This prediction has not come to fruition, as the two major parties continue to hold a strong grip on the American political system.

Party realignment: Shivani argued that the two major parties would realign and become more ideologically diverse. While there has been some movement within the parties, the two-party system remains firmly in place.

Changing trends in media: Shivani predicted that the media would play a more significant role in politics, which has indeed come true with the rise of social media and the 24-hour news cycle.

Polarization: Shivani argued that polarization would increase, with both parties becoming more ideologically extreme. This prediction has come to fruition, with both parties becoming more divided along ideological lines.

The role of third parties: Shivani predicted that third parties would play a more significant role in American politics. While third parties have made some gains, they still remain largely marginalized.

In conclusion, while some of Shivani's predictions have come true, others have not. The two-party system remains firmly in place, and the major parties continue to dominate American politics. However, the increase in polarization and the growing role of media in politics suggest that the American political landscape is changing.

Counterargument: Some may argue that Shivani's predictions were incorrect because they were based on a flawed understanding of American politics. They may argue that the two-party system is deeply ingrained in American culture and that third parties will never be able to gain significant traction. However, the increasing polarization of the two major parties and the growing disillusionment of voters suggest that the political landscape may indeed be changing, and that third parties may play a more significant role in the future.

User Anusha Kottiyal
by
7.8k points