39.6k views
3 votes
Should Napolean's expansion of the borders of the First French Empire at the expense of European monarchies be viewed as conquest or liberation?​

User Vetemi
by
7.4k points

2 Answers

0 votes

Answer: Napoleon's expansion of the borders of the First French Empire at the expense of European monarchies can be viewed differently depending on one's perspective. Some may see it as conquest, as Napoleon and his armies forcibly took control of various territories and imposed French rule upon them. Others may view it as liberation, as Napoleon brought about political and social reforms, such as the Napoleonic Code, that abolished feudalism and promoted equality before the law, and helped to spread the ideals of the French Revolution. However, it's important to note that Napoleon's rule was also marked by war and destruction, the imposition of conscription, and the displacement and oppression of local populations. It's a complex issue and different perspectives may have different opinions about it.

Explanation: You can tweak this answer to what you're opinion is. Hope this helps!

User Chris Lear
by
7.3k points
4 votes

The question of whether Napolean's expansion of the borders of the First French Empire should be viewed as conquest or liberation is a matter of perspective and interpretation. Some may view it as liberation, as it brought about political and social change and spread revolutionary ideals to the conquered territories. Others may view it as conquest, as it involved military force and resulted in the subjugation of other nations and peoples under French rule. Ultimately, it depends on one's political, historical, and cultural perspective.

User Subhadeep Ray
by
7.4k points