An example of begging the question is the statement: "The Bible is true because it says so in the Bible." This statement is circular reasoning because it uses the Bible as evidence for itself, rather than providing independent evidence to support its truth.
The phrase "begging the question" actually refers to a type of logical fallacy in which an argument assumes the truth of its own conclusion, rather than providing evidence to support it. It is also known as petitio principii, which means "assuming the initial point." This type of reasoning is problematic because it fails to prove the conclusion and instead relies on the assumption that the conclusion is already true.