Final answer:
The flaws of direct democracy include tyranny of the majority, mob rule, and inefficiency. The founding fathers adopted a republic instead of a democracy to protect minority rights, prevent tyranny, and ensure representation.
Step-by-step explanation:
Flaws of Direct Democracy:
- Tyranny of the Majority: In a direct democracy, the majority can easily dominate and oppress the minority, leading to the violation of minority rights.
- Mob Rule: Direct democracy can result in decisions that are driven by emotional reactions and populism rather than careful deliberation and expertise.
- Inefficiency: Direct democracy requires a significant amount of time and resources to hold frequent referendums and engage all citizens in decision-making.
Reasons for Adopting a Republic:
- Protection of Minority Rights: The Founding Fathers were concerned about safeguarding the rights and freedoms of all individuals, including minorities, which could be better achieved through the system of a republic.
- Preventing Tyranny: They also sought to avoid the potential dangers of mob rule and the tyranny of the majority that could arise in a direct democracy.
- Representation: A republic allows for the election of representatives who can engage in thoughtful deliberation and make informed decisions on behalf of the people.