38.2k views
4 votes
What are the flaws of direct democracy, and why did the founding fathers adopt a

republic vs a democracy?

User Milo
by
8.8k points

2 Answers

5 votes

Answer:

The Founding Fathers wanted republicanism because its principles guaranteed liberty, with opposing, limited powers offsetting one another.

User Duikboot
by
7.3k points
5 votes

Final answer:

The flaws of direct democracy include tyranny of the majority, mob rule, and inefficiency. The founding fathers adopted a republic instead of a democracy to protect minority rights, prevent tyranny, and ensure representation.

Step-by-step explanation:

Flaws of Direct Democracy:

  • Tyranny of the Majority: In a direct democracy, the majority can easily dominate and oppress the minority, leading to the violation of minority rights.
  • Mob Rule: Direct democracy can result in decisions that are driven by emotional reactions and populism rather than careful deliberation and expertise.
  • Inefficiency: Direct democracy requires a significant amount of time and resources to hold frequent referendums and engage all citizens in decision-making.

Reasons for Adopting a Republic:

  • Protection of Minority Rights: The Founding Fathers were concerned about safeguarding the rights and freedoms of all individuals, including minorities, which could be better achieved through the system of a republic.
  • Preventing Tyranny: They also sought to avoid the potential dangers of mob rule and the tyranny of the majority that could arise in a direct democracy.
  • Representation: A republic allows for the election of representatives who can engage in thoughtful deliberation and make informed decisions on behalf of the people.

User Chejaras
by
7.6k points

No related questions found