Answer:
During the Progressive Era (approximately 1890-1920), the United States faced several pandemics, including the Spanish Flu and the Bubonic Plague. The country was still relatively young and had a limited public health infrastructure compared to today.
During this time, the government's response to pandemics was primarily focused on controlling the spread of disease through quarantine measures and sanitation efforts. City and state governments often imposed strict quarantine measures on individuals and communities, and public health officials focused on sanitizing public spaces and tracking the spread of the disease.
In contrast, the current COVID-19 pandemic has been met with a more centralized response led by the federal government, in coordination with state and local authorities. In addition to quarantine measures and contact tracing, the government has also focused on developing and distributing vaccines as a means of controlling the spread of the disease.
One major difference between the Progressive Era and the current era is the level of medical knowledge and technology available. During the Progressive Era, treatments for infectious diseases were limited and often ineffective, while today we have a much better understanding of how viruses and bacteria spread and can treat them with more effective measures.
From the historical examples, we can learn that pandemics have always been disruptive and challenging to society. The lessons that can be learned from past experiences include the importance of having a strong public health infrastructure in place, the need for effective communication and coordination between government and health officials, and the importance of investing in scientific research and development to better understand and combat infectious diseases. Additionally, history also tells us that pandemics have been a test of resilience and adaptability of societies and individuals, which is something we can learn from and apply to the current situation.