Answer:
Appealing to emotion can be an effective debate strategy because it can resonate with people and make them more likely to agree with your argument. For example, if you're trying to persuade someone to support a cause, you might use stories and imagery that elicit empathy and compassion. This can be very powerful in convincing people to take action.
On the other hand, appealing to emotion can also be an ineffective debate strategy because it can cause people to make decisions based on their feelings rather than facts. This can lead to irrational or ill-informed choices. Additionally, if the opposing side can counter the emotional appeal with logical arguments, the person using emotional appeals may appear less credible.
In summary, appealing to emotion can be effective in conjunction with logical arguments to create a persuasive case, but relying too heavily on emotional appeals can lead to poor decision-making. In addition, it can undermine the credibility of the person making the argument.
Step-by-step explanation: