Answer:
Yes, Legal provisions and institutional arrangements depend upon the needs of the society and the philosophy adopted by the society.
Step-by-step explanation:
Almost as old as philosophy itself, social contract theory is the view that the moral and/or political obligations of individuals depend on contracts or agreements to shape the society in which they live. Socrates uses something like the social contract argument to explain to Crito why he must remain in prison and accept the death penalty. However, social contract theory is rightly associated with contemporary moral and political theory, receiving its first complete explanation and justification from Thomas Hobbes. After Hobbes, John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau are the most famous representatives of this highly influential theory and the most dominant of moral and political theories in modern Western history. In the 20th century, moral and political theory regained philosophical momentum with John Rawls' version of social contract theory, followed by new analyzes of the subject by David Gautier and others. It was conducted. Recently, philosophers from various perspectives have come up with new critiques of social contract theory. In particular, feminists and racially conscious philosophers believe that social contract theory is at least an incomplete picture of our moral and political lives and that in fact, the contract itself is parasitic on individual class conquest. It claims to have the potential to camouflage in several ways.Legal provisions and institutional arrangements depend upon the needs of the society and the philosophy adopted by the society.