72.0k views
3 votes
In a speech about smoking, what type of warrant could Brynn offer?

A.
Clearly, CDC statistics show that people’s health is endangered by secondhand smoke.

B.
Smoking should be banned in public places because secondhand smoke is dangerous.

C.
Secondhand smoke contributes to 7,330 lung cancer deaths per year according to the CDC.

D.
Some might say that banning smoking violates their rights, but secondhand smoke exposure is a violation of my right to breathe clean air.

User Domso
by
7.6k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Answer: C. Secondhand smoke contributes to 7,330 lung cancer deaths per year according to the CDC.

Explanation: A warrant is a logical reasoning or justification that connects the evidence to the claim. In this case, Brynn's claim could be that smoking should be banned in public places. The warrant she offers is that secondhand smoke contributes to 7,330 lung cancer deaths per year, as stated by the CDC.

By presenting this evidence, Brynn establishes a connection between secondhand smoke and its detrimental health effects, specifically the significant number of lung cancer deaths. This warrant provides a logical basis for her claim that smoking should be banned in public places, as it highlights the potential harm that secondhand smoke can cause to non-smokers.

User Sirrocco
by
7.4k points