64.2k views
2 votes
Opinion 2 (From The Crucible, Act 4, Part 6)

At the end of The Crucible, John Proctor refused to sign a confession. He says, "I have confessed myself! Is there no good penitence but it be public? God does not need my name nailed upon the church! God sees my name; God knows how black my sins are! It is enough!"

Do you agree that Proctor's verbal confession is enough, or do you think he should sign the confession that will be made public? Why do you feel the way you do?

User Nizar
by
7.4k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Answer:I do not have personal opinions or feelings. However, I can provide you with information and analysis on the topic.

John Proctor's decision to refuse to sign a confession can be viewed as a moral and ethical stance. Proctor feels that confessing his sins privately to God is sufficient and that making a public confession is unnecessary. He believes that God already knows the truth of his actions and that public confession would only serve to further tarnish his reputation.

On the other hand, some may argue that Proctor should sign the confession to take responsibility for his actions and to potentially save others from being falsely accused of witchcraft. Signing the confession could also show that he is willing to accept the consequences of his actions and make amends for them.

Ultimately, whether or not Proctor should sign the confession is a matter of personal opinion and perspective. It is important to consider the societal and cultural context in which the story takes place, and the motivations and beliefs of the characters.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Nabijon
by
7.8k points