169k views
0 votes
Common Lit: Si Se Puede!

Essay: Cesar Chavez believed that all people should be treated fairly and used nonviolent action to fight for justice for workers. In the text, the author discusses how Cesar Chavez rejected violence. Do you agree with his opinion that violence only leads to more violence? Why or why not? What other activists believed in peaceful protesting? Provide textual evidence to support your ideas.

A. Plan your response on this page.
B. Use next page to write your final response.

1. Tesis
what? | why?
|
|
|
|

Thesis:

Kernal essay:

1.
2.
3.
4.



User Mohrn
by
7.1k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Answer:

I agree with Caesar Chavez’s opinion that violence only leads to more violence.

Step-by-step explanation:

Violence is a cycle that is extremely difficult to break, and often leads to more violence and destruction instead of change or progress. It is also not an effective way to create meaningful change because it often leads to retaliation, rather than resolution. As Chavez himself said, “Violence is counterproductive because it creates more problems than it solves. It does not solve problems, it just creates new ones.”

Instead of violence, Chavez advocated for peaceful protesting as a way to fight for justice. He believed that peaceful protesting was a more effective tool to create meaningful change, and could also be used to draw attention to the cause and bring people together. In the text, Chavez spoke of the importance of peaceful protesting, saying, “It is important to have peaceful protests. It is important to have non-violent protests, to show the public that you’re not doing anything wrong and that you’re doing something right.” He also emphasized the importance of unity, saying, “We must not be divided. We must be united. United we can do something. Divided we cannot do anything.”

In addition to peaceful protesting

User Bbeckford
by
7.1k points