Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Each person at least once in his life finds himself in a difficult life situation, when perhaps there is not enough strength to be in the territory with trials. In this case, a person desperately needs support and help, no matter - from loved ones or strangers. Any person should understand this also for those who find themselves in a critical situation, because someday help comes to him. A person who is aware of the problems of another person faces a moral choice: to help him, to sacrifice his own strength, time, known or other costs, or to leave problems alone with him. Anyone who decides to help a person chooses the right path - the path of morality. By helping hereditary people, a person makes them prosperous, increases the amount of goodness in the world, and improves his mood.
The problems of moral choice and surrounding aspirations are raised in the text of K.G. Paustovsky. Here the image of a kind and sympathetic narrator is revealed, who found help for an organ grinder whose parrot died. After hearing the story of her son, the heroine faces a moral choice. A rich woman could react quite calmly and even indifferently to the fate of the organ grinder, but she chooses a different path - indifference and assistance. The narrator's mother realized that without the organ grinder's parrot it would be difficult to feed herself and her family, because the parrot played a big role in the organ grinder's work. The narrator's mother buys a new parrot (sentence 31). The author of the text shows that the heroine spends her time and energy when she goes after a parrot, and then to the organ grinder's house, she spends her own money when she buys a parrot. All this is completely disinterested, without demanding anything in return. The act of the heroine benefits the organ grinder, who gets the opportunity to carry out activities that bring him his livelihood.
The problem raised in the text is reflected in other literary works. In the story of A.I. Kuprin's "Wonderful Doctor" speaks of the act of Dr. Pirogov. Having met with Emelyan Mertsalov in the park and listened to his consumption history, the main character faced a moral choice: to help a stranger, if he finds himself in this stress, or to pass by, about not putting the acquaintance to solve his problems on his own. Dr. Pirogov decides to help the Mertsalov family. With their indifference, Dr. Pirogov saved the head of the family from committing a crime. After examining the sick Maka, leaving a few material resources and giving them important life advice, Dr. Pirogov saved the entire Mertsalov family from starvation.
revealed from all of the above, we can conclude that when a person faces a mental choice, manifests himself with an appeal or non-provision of help to someone, you should always strive to help other people, regardless of whether you are familiar or not, regardless from the attitude to the position of the person, help is needed.