Final answer:
Today's true-crime stories differ from those of the past in their delivery and reception; with multiple media formats and modern technology, they are more accessible and engaging, which may affect public perception of crime rates and safety.
Step-by-step explanation:
Today's true-crime stories differ from those of the past primarily in the way they are produced and consumed. The evolution of media has transformed how stories are told, with multiple platforms and media formats now hosting true-crime content. This includes television series, podcasts, and online articles, among others. Additionally, modern true-crime stories may incorporate interactive elements or leverage social media to engage audiences further. Unlike the past, where crime stories might have been confined to newspapers or radio broadcasts, today's narratives are more accessible and diverse in their presentation.
These changes have implications for public perception of crime and may contribute to heightened levels of fear and misconception about crime rates. Research suggests that extensive media coverage and engagement with crime stories can lead people to overestimate actual crime rates and feel more fearful about experiencing crime themselves. A past example of this phenomenon includes Adolph Ochs's efforts with the New York Times to provide impartial and accurate journalism, facilitating a push towards detailed investigative work akin to muckraking journalism. Today, however, the rapid news cycle and economic pressures have led to a decline in investigative journalism, potentially affecting the depth and quality of news content.