Answer: Choice A
No because the bike order does not meet the restrictions of

===================================================
Step-by-step explanation:
c = number of child bikes
a = number of adult bikes
Each child bike takes 4 hours to build. This means 4c represents the total time spent building all c number of child bikes. Eg: if c = 2, then 4c = 4*2 = 8 hours is spent total building these two child bikes.
Meanwhile, each adult bike takes 6 hours to build. That means 6a represents the total time spent building these subset of bikes.
The expression 4c+6a is the total time spent building all of the bikes, child and adult.
The company has 120 hours of building time. The total time (4c+6a) cannot exceed this 120 hour ceiling.
This is how we arrive at
which is one of the constraints or restrictions.
------------------------------
Now onto the testing side of things.
Each child bike takes 4 hours to test. That gives us 4c.
Each adult bike takes 4 hours to test. We get 4a.
4c+4a = total testing time for all of the bikes
is the second restriction we place, since we have at most 100 hours of testing time total. We cannot exceed this.
------------------------------
To summarize so far:
is the restriction for build time
is the restriction for testing time
Let's see if we can build c = 20 child bikes and a = 6 adult bikes
Plug this pair of values into the first inequality

The last inequality is true, which means the inequality
is also true for the values c = 20 and a = 6.
So far it looks like we can build these number of bikes.
But we need to check the other inequality.

We run into a problem. The last inequality is false, which means
is false when c = 20 and a = 6 are plugged into it.
Meaning it is impossible to test 20 child bikes and 6 adult bikes in a week.
This is why choice A is the final answer.