Question

"Dark Gray had the most consistent temperature at 88°F" Which BEST explains why this a weak evidence statement? "Dark Gray had the most consistent temperature at 88°F" Which BEST explains why this a weak evidence statement? The evidence statement is based on bad/incorrect data. The evidence statement is untrue. The evidence statement is extra information that doesn't help answer the question. The evidence statement contains reasoning. The evidence statement contains a claim.

Answer 1

the evidence statement contains reasoning.

Step-by-step explanation:

the reason that this piece of information is reasoning rather than evidence is because it doesn't tell us the temperatures of the other substances (if any.) if we look at this substance and it has the most constant temperature compared to the others, how will we know if it is the most constant if we don't know the other substances' data?

this is reasoning because the evidence should tell us more about the substance and the others.