Question

How is evaluating an argument different from analyzing it?

Answer 1

Evaluating would be how viable the argument is in the context of the argument but analyzing would be what they meant by each point they made in the argument, but not to see if it is viable but just to understand it better deeply.

Step-by-step explanation:

Evaluate: "form an idea of the amount, number, or value of; assess.:

Analyze: "examine methodically and in detail the constitution or structure of (something, especially information), typically for purposes of explanation and interpretation."

Answer 2

Answer:
I hope this is correct!

Evaluating an argument involves determining whether the argument is good or bad, strong or weak, valid or invalid. This often involves assessing the evidence that is presented, the logical structure of the argument, and the overall coherence and clarity of the argument. In contrast, analyzing an argument involves breaking it down into its component parts, examining the relationships between those parts, and identifying the underlying assumptions and logical structure of the argument. Both evaluating and analyzing an argument are important skills in critical thinking and are often used together.