31.8k views
0 votes
The following question has two parts. First, answer part A. Then, answer part B.

Part A:

Which of the following BEST describes the purpose of the presentation?
A
to make the claim that fluoride in water supplies is no longer needed

B
to point out the benefits of adding fluoride to city water supplies

C
to introduce reasons that adding fluoride to drinking water is controversial

D
to explain why public health officials first added fluoride to drinking water

Part B:

Which sentence from the presentation BEST supports your answer in part A?
A
In 1945, some cities in the United States began adding fluoride, a chemical that protects teeth from cavities, to their drinking water.

B
Since 1945, the country's dental health has gotten much better, and we are also more aware of how important good dental care is.

C
Most people prefer having fluoride in their water, but some have complained to their city governments about it.

D
Experts agree that fluoride added to city water has really improved the health of people's teeth.

1 Answer

1 vote

Answer:

Part 1: B. to point out the benefits of adding fluoride to city water supplies

Part 2: B. Since 1945, the country's dental health has gotten much better, and we are also more aware of how important good dental care is.

Step-by-step explanation:

One of the benefits of adding fluoride to water supplies is better dental health, aka stronger teeth.

In addition, the answer to part 2 shows that adding fluoride to water supplies has been proven efficient for over 7 decades (since 1945), which shows that fluoride with water is a healthy combination for us to use.

Option D in part 2 only states the experts' opinions on fluoride being added to city water, not the actual benefits of fluoride being added to city water.

User Ricardo Alamino
by
8.3k points

No related questions found