Answer:
We know that Keilantra has $660 to spend, she has already spent $488.20 on a bicycle, $11.17 on two reflectors and $19.05 on a pair of gloves.
We can represent the amount spent on reflectors as 2 * $11.17 = $22.34
So the total amount spent so far is:
$488.20 + $22.34 + $19.05 = $529.59
We can represent the remaining amount of money she has to spend on outfits as:
$660 - $529.59 = $130.41
We can use this remaining amount to find out the number of outfits she can purchase by dividing the remaining amount by the cost of each outfit:
$130.41 / $37.26 = 3.5
The inequality that represents this situation is:
x <= 3.5
Where x is the number of outfits Keilantra can purchase while staying within her budget.
This inequality tells us that Keilantra can purchase at most 3.5 biking outfits while staying within her budget.
However, since the number of outfits has to be a whole number, the greatest number of outfits that Keilantra can buy is 3.