108k views
4 votes
What were the critics given to the school of Neo classical management theory as strength/weakness

User Vempo
by
7.6k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The critics of the school of Neo-classical management theory have identified several strengths and weaknesses of this approach.

Strengths:

  1. Emphasis on rationality: The neo-classical management theory emphasizes the importance of rationality and efficiency in decision-making, which can lead to better and more effective management practices.
  2. Focus on human behavior: The theory pays attention to human behavior and motivation in the workplace, which can lead to a better understanding of how employees can be motivated to work harder and more efficiently.
  3. Flexibility: The theory is flexible and can be applied to different types of organizations, making it a versatile tool for managers.

Weaknesses:

  1. Lack of attention to social factors: The theory has been criticized for not considering the role of social factors, such as power dynamics and politics, in shaping organizational behavior.
  2. Limited understanding of human behavior: The theory's understanding of human behavior and motivation is limited, and it does not take into account the complexity of human behavior.
  3. Assumptions about rationality: The theory assumes that individuals are rational, which is not always the case, and can lead to unrealistic expectations about the behavior of employees.
  4. Ignores the cultural and societal factors that influence organizations.
  5. It has been criticized for lack of attention to the role of power and politics in shaping organizational behavior.
  6. The theory is criticized for ignoring the role of external factors on organizational behavior, such as technology, culture and societal changes.