149k views
5 votes
In the diagram below, m is the perpendicular bisector of BC.

Is ΔABK ≅ ΔACK? Justify.
so far i have this, angle APB is a right angle- perpendicular bisectors form right angles. angle APC is a right angle- perpendicular bisectors form right angles. angle APB is congruent to angle APC- all right angles are congruent. But I don't know if this is right



literally the last question on my test. Please please please help

In the diagram below, m is the perpendicular bisector of BC. Is ΔABK ≅ ΔACK? Justify-example-1
User Ectoras
by
6.6k points

2 Answers

2 votes
The figure appears to be a Kite, so we’ll use properties of Kites to help prove △ABK≅△ACK.

BK≅CK ——>by Properties of Kites.

∠ABK≅∠ACK ——> by Properties of a Kites

AB≅AC ——> by properties of Kites.

△ABK≅△ACK ——> by the SAS postulate.
User Buzzet
by
6.7k points
5 votes

Answer:

yes 5=89

Explanation:

User Juanmajmjr
by
7.1k points