Answer:
In the context of this poem, revenge can be justified in certain circumstances. The speaker's act of revenge in this poem can be justified if the anger and hurt they felt was caused by an intentional act of harm. In the poem, the speaker's anger and hurt is caused by the friend's refusal to forgive, which is an intentional act of harm. Evidence from this text that supports this is seen in the line, "I was angry with my friend: I told it not, my wrath did grow." The speaker's wrath and anger is a result of the friend's refusal to forgive, and this can be seen as an intentional act of harm.
Evidence from other literature, art, and history can also be used to support the idea that revenge can be justified in certain circumstances. For example, in William Shakespeare’s play, Hamlet, the title character seeks revenge for the death of his father. This is seen as justified, as his father's death was caused by an intentional act of harm. Additionally, in the Bible, the Old Testament includes stories of people seeking revenge for acts of harm done to them. This is seen as justified, as the harm done to them was intentional.
Overall, revenge can be justified in certain circumstances, and in the context of this poem, the speaker's act of revenge can be seen as justified if the anger and hurt they felt was caused by an intentional act of harm. Evidence from this text, other literature, art, and history can be used to support this idea.
Step-by-step explanation: