Question

Why was hoovers response to drought victims in the midwest unwise from a political standpoint.

Answer 1

The American public ultimately responded with anger and protest to Hoover's apparent inability to create solutions. Protests ranged from factory strikes to farm riots, culminating in the notorious Bonus Army protest in the spring of 1932.

Step-by-step explanation:

In 1930–1931, it attempted to pass a $60 million bill to provide relief to drought victims by allowing them access to food, fertilizer, and animal feed. Hoover stood fast in his refusal to provide food, resisting any element of direct relief.

I hope this helps you out :D

Answer 2

Herbert Hoover's response to drought victims in the Midwest in the early 1930s was unwise from a political standpoint for several reasons:

Lack of federal aid: Despite the severity of the drought, Hoover did not initially provide federal aid to the affected farmers and communities. He believed that the responsibility for helping the victims should fall to state and local governments and private organizations. This decision was criticized by many as being insufficient in the face of such a large crisis.

Lack of empathy: Hoover's response was seen as unsympathetic and insensitive. He is reported to have said that "any man worth his salt will work" and "it's an opportunity to work" to unemployed and suffering Americans, which was perceived as lack of understanding the gravity of the situation

Failure to understand public opinion: Hoover's response failed to take into account public opinion, which was largely in favor of more robust federal aid for the drought victims.

Failure to communicate effectively: Hoover was criticized for his poor communication skills and for being out of touch with the needs and concerns of ordinary Americans. He did not engage with the public effectively and left many Americans feeling as though he was indifferent to their plight.