Final answer:
This source is not credible because it describes only the publication date, and credibility depends on various factors such as author expertise, peer review, and unbiased information.
Step-by-step explanation:
The credibility of a source is not solely determined by its publication date. In this case, the answer suggests that the source is credible because it was published recently. However, credibility involves a more comprehensive assessment. Factors such as the author's expertise, potential biases, the publication's reputation, and whether it underwent peer review contribute to credibility.
In the provided excerpt, there is no information about the author's qualifications, potential biases, or the peer-review process. Additionally, the fact that the source is well-written and lacks spelling or grammar errors does not necessarily guarantee credibility. It's crucial to evaluate the depth of research, the inclusion of diverse perspectives, and the source's overall reliability.
To make an informed judgment about the credibility of Mental Floss, one would need to consider additional information beyond the publication date, taking into account the source's reputation, editorial standards, and the author's expertise in the subject matter.