Question

Difference between senators for life and senators by right

Answer 1

The student's question confuses non-existent categories within U.S. legislative terms. There are no 'senators for life' or 'senitors by right' in America; all U.S. senators are elected to six-year terms and can serve an unlimited number of terms if reelected.

Step-by-step explanation:

The primary difference between senators for life and senators by right seems to refer to the distinction in how U.S. senators and other types of non-elected senators maintain their positions. However, the information provided and the student's question itself seems to be conflating two different terms or describing an incorrect category. In the U.S. context, all senators are elected to six-year terms and may serve unlimited terms if continuously reelected; there is no official category for 'senators by right' or 'senators for life.'

In the United States, the Constitution doesn't provide for senators to hold a lifelong position, and no senators are afforded the position by right outside of election or appointment to fill a vacancy. Traditionally, senators were elected by state legislatures, but since the 17th Amendment's ratification in 1913, senators have been directly elected by the citizens of their states. Because of this history, some might mistakenly refer to 'senators for life' as those holding office indefinitely through repeated reelection, but there's no formalization of this concept in U.S. law. Senators 'by right,' if the term were to be used in some other context, would imply they hold the position due to some legal right outside of election, which does not apply to the U.S. Senate either.

In summary, there is no formal distinction in the U.S. between 'senators for life' and 'senators by right,' as both terms do not apply to the American legislative framework. All U.S. senators serve six-year terms and are subject to reelection by their state's electorate. This understanding is crucial for comparing the structure of the U.S. Senate to other legislative bodies which might have different rules regarding the appointment or election of senators.

Answer 2

Step-by-step explanation:

Rules are meant to be broken when needed.

When you can't do anything about a situation and the last option is to break the rules. Depending on the time and situation given. You do the crime you do the time. For example. If you had to come up with the money to save your family and time is not on your side the last thing you can do is to steal for the ones you love then if it saves their life wouldn't anyone risk their life for their family? When I say risk their life I mean freedom. We all know the consequences that follow and we will sacrifice our own self to save those we love especially our children/our loved ones people who mean everything to us. If we had no choice given and we tried our best to get help from everyone to anyone but no one was there to help what else can you/we do?

Now this isn't always the best thing to do in some scenarios but as long as breaking the rules don't involve hurting anyone or taking someone's life away I'm sure that if it saves a life or many lives then yes rules are meant to be broken. I would break it if needed just to save many or even just 1 life because 1 matters.

Anyways RULES should stay the way it is it has worked for so long but there are just some that need to be looked into that may need a little bit of tweaking. The rule-makers knows whats best for the people I'm sure they did not just get to where they are at without the knowledge and experience and I'm sure they also had to live the way others did in order to experience what others are experiencing they can even be beside us and we don't even know it. To know what rules are to be broken you must first experience the reasoning as to why they had to be broken. The reasonings vs the excuses. Which one outweighs is there's a will there's a can. You will do your hardest to succeed in life by obeying rules along the way. Rules are there not to keep us in line but to help us along the way. We have our own will our own rights and the knowledge to know what is wrong or right we also are given the feeling that we have felt in our journey and we know when something seems to be off or wrong like Spiderman we get these senses. A666nd it is up to us to follow it. Our intuition plays a big part you will sense things that makes eye doesn't see this is when your body mind and soul aligns and when it does you just know and feel that you must do what you believe is right even thou you know that it may break some rules but you just know that you need to it because you can see it by the experience you have encountered and the knowledge you have learned from it. And when you feel that something just isn't right or you just feel that it's needed you go with your feeling and what you believe. And because you believe you need to see for yourself that what you feel is right so you go blindness into the unknown and you hope that you are right and if you arnt well atleast you went with what you believe in and now you know. Atleast it was your own choice. So let me ask now thesame questions are rules meant to be broken? Yes they are but that's the test of life the questions we should ask is. What are you willing to sacrifice? Your freedom? Or the freedom of others? If you can make a difference and if you had to endure all the pain and suffering to change something wouldn't you sacrifice yourself if it helps all of us? If it can make a difference?