Question

What do you think about this??? Answer in 3-4 Sentences.

WW1 was considered the first modern war because of the technology used in combat.

A good example of this is the discontinuation of using horses in combat, (with exceptions, such as the French.) Horses were commonly used for centuries before. This is due to their sheer power and speed. With new technology, however, locomotives were commonplace, and even tanks became common to use. This is because they were far easier to use, you had to teach a person how to ride a horse well, not even including combat, this was a difficult and time-consuming task.

It was far easier to teach someone how to operate a locomotive. The locomotives also took a lot less care, since they were not alive. They could not die due to disease, they could carry far more weight than horses could, they were far more durable, they did not need to eat or drink, and could carry multiple people.

Horses did excel in some things, such as speed, but the simple fact was that new technology had allowed humanity to advance further than ever before, even in war.

Answer 1

It is clear that the introduction of new technology in WW1 had a major impact on modern warfare. The use of locomotives and tanks made the war far more efficient and effective, as they could carry more weight and personnel than horses, and they did not need to be cared for in the same way. Additionally, they were far easier to teach people how to use, which was a major advantage. WW1 was the first war to make use of this technology, and it is clear that it has had a lasting impact on the way we fight wars today.

Step-by-step explanation: