Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
An absolute monarch, such as Peter the Great, holds absolute power and authority within their realm and is not subject to any constitutional or legal limitations on their power. They are often considered to be autocratic rulers who wield their power arbitrarily and without accountability. In contrast, a constitutional monarch, such as James I, is a ceremonial head of state who holds limited powers that are defined and restricted by a constitution. They typically do not have any role in the day-to-day governance of the country, but rather serve as a symbolic figurehead and arbitrator in times of crisis.
In terms of their reigns, Peter the Great is known for implementing sweeping reforms and modernizing Russia during his reign as Tsar in the early 18th century. He centralized the government, established a standing army, and Westernized Russian society and culture. James I, on the other hand, was the King of England and Ireland from 1603 to 1625, and is known for his role in the English Civil War and the establishment of the Church of England. He is also famous for his contributions to English literature, including the King James Bible.